<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Subject Code</title>
	<link>http://marcoil.org</link>
	<description>marcoil's thoughts on programming</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on NPAPI plugin support included in Qt 4.5 release candidate by Simon Hausmann</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/168#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Hausmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/168#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>Great work Marc! I'm using it for my everday browsing :-)


Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Marc! I&#8217;m using it for my everday browsing <img src='http://marcoil.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NPAPI plugin support included in Qt 4.5 release candidate by Pierre-Luc Beaudoin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marc&#8217;s work now in Qt 4.5</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/168#comment-2976</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre-Luc Beaudoin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marc&#8217;s work now in Qt 4.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/168#comment-2976</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc spent weeks implementing NPAPI plugins support in QtWebKit, now that Qt 4.5 is available as a release candidate, you can now enjoy the work he did for Collabora. Be sure to read his post, it&#8217;s more interesting hehe.       This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 11th, 2009 at 14:24 and is filed under , WebKit. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marc spent weeks implementing NPAPI plugins support in QtWebKit, now that Qt 4.5 is available as a release candidate, you can now enjoy the work he did for Collabora. Be sure to read his post, it&#8217;s more interesting hehe.       This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 11th, 2009 at 14:24 and is filed under , WebKit. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages by Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should update the wikipedia entries then.

To me, "GvR repeats the confusion between X and Y" sounds like "GvR is wrong", and that's what I disagree with.  I am not wrong in making this distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should update the wikipedia entries then.</p>
<p>To me, &#8220;GvR repeats the confusion between X and Y&#8221; sounds like &#8220;GvR is wrong&#8221;, and that&#8217;s what I disagree with.  I am not wrong in making this distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages by marcoil</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>@Guido van Rossum: I would never call you "confused" in these matters, and I'm sorry if my wording led you to think that.

Still, I do think that two different language categories are generally "confused" while there are enough differences to maintain them apart. Not just in their programming environments, but also in the way they work.

I don't think I am "confused" in this matter either, although I'm clearly disagreeing with "how these terms are usually understood".

Once again, I'm sorry you took my dissenting opinion as a personal attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Guido van Rossum: I would never call you &#8220;confused&#8221; in these matters, and I&#8217;m sorry if my wording led you to think that.</p>
<p>Still, I do think that two different language categories are generally &#8220;confused&#8221; while there are enough differences to maintain them apart. Not just in their programming environments, but also in the way they work.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I am &#8220;confused&#8221; in this matter either, although I&#8217;m clearly disagreeing with &#8220;how these terms are usually understood&#8221;.</p>
<p>Once again, I&#8217;m sorry you took my dissenting opinion as a personal attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages by Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>There's a distinction alright, but it's not between scripting and dynamic languages. Their definitions in wikipedia match how these terms are usually understood: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language vs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language .

The distinction you are trying to make is more between languages with a big programming environment built in (Smalltalk, many Lisp systems) vs. (more traditional) languages with external programming environments (Java, some Lisps, most other languages).

I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I am "repeating a confusion." I know perfectly well what I am talking about, and most people would agree with my terminology. You are the one who is "confused".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a distinction alright, but it&#8217;s not between scripting and dynamic languages. Their definitions in wikipedia match how these terms are usually understood: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language</a> vs. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language</a> .</p>
<p>The distinction you are trying to make is more between languages with a big programming environment built in (Smalltalk, many Lisp systems) vs. (more traditional) languages with external programming environments (Java, some Lisps, most other languages).</p>
<p>I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I am &#8220;repeating a confusion.&#8221; I know perfectly well what I am talking about, and most people would agree with my terminology. You are the one who is &#8220;confused&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages by marcoil</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>@Guido van Rossum: I agree the distinction is not generally recognized, that's why I'm making it. 

The names I've used are possibly not the best, but I do think there's a real difference on how Lisp and Smalltalk worked when compared to languages like Python or Perl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Guido van Rossum: I agree the distinction is not generally recognized, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m making it. </p>
<p>The names I&#8217;ve used are possibly not the best, but I do think there&#8217;s a real difference on how Lisp and Smalltalk worked when compared to languages like Python or Perl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripting languages are not the same as dynamic languages by Guido van Rossum</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido van Rossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/164#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>I don't believe this distinction is generally agreed upon. Can you show some references (e.g. Wikipedia) and examples of languages that are scripting and languages that are dynamic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe this distinction is generally agreed upon. Can you show some references (e.g. Wikipedia) and examples of languages that are scripting and languages that are dynamic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gits won by Jakub Narębski</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/162#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Narębski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/162#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>Performance _does_ matter, if one tools takes minutes and the other subsecond; it matters even if for one tool it takes seconds and for other fraction of second.

As to "Worse is Better": in Junio's addendum to FLOSS Weekly about git, he wrote that multiple branches in single repository was not something that was in initial git design. Yet git design was flexible enough to allow it. I think that git support for multiple branches in single repository is superior to other version control tools: Bazaar-NG and Mercurial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performance _does_ matter, if one tools takes minutes and the other subsecond; it matters even if for one tool it takes seconds and for other fraction of second.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;Worse is Better&#8221;: in Junio&#8217;s addendum to FLOSS Weekly about git, he wrote that multiple branches in single repository was not something that was in initial git design. Yet git design was flexible enough to allow it. I think that git support for multiple branches in single repository is superior to other version control tools: Bazaar-NG and Mercurial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My first WebKit patch landed and I was on vacation! by marcoil</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/124#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>marcoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/124#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Roman. The work I did was for QtWebKit and WebKit/Gtk on Linux platforms.

NPAPI Plugins on Mac work a little different, and I think (but I'm not sure) Safari plugins use a completely different API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Roman. The work I did was for QtWebKit and WebKit/Gtk on Linux platforms.</p>
<p>NPAPI Plugins on Mac work a little different, and I think (but I&#8217;m not sure) Safari plugins use a completely different API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My first WebKit patch landed and I was on vacation! by Roman</title>
		<link>http://marcoil.org/archive/124#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://marcoil.org/archive/124#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>Great work! I've just tested in the Mac 4.5 11/16 snapshot, and it looks like Flash works damn well. However, other plugins like QuickTime seem to cause crashes, while they work fine in Safari.

Any ideas why? I'd be glad to help with the implementation to get NPAPI plugin support stable.

Also, does the code support the npruntime extensions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work! I&#8217;ve just tested in the Mac 4.5 11/16 snapshot, and it looks like Flash works damn well. However, other plugins like QuickTime seem to cause crashes, while they work fine in Safari.</p>
<p>Any ideas why? I&#8217;d be glad to help with the implementation to get NPAPI plugin support stable.</p>
<p>Also, does the code support the npruntime extensions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
